Here are my reasoning steps:
The user wants us to rewrite the article in HTML valid Italian, following the rules: use

for subtitles and

for paragraphs, no extra delimiters, maintain meaning, no invented info. The article is minimal: just a title and an image tag. The content is basically an image with alt text describing the title. There’s no other content. The user wants us to rewrite the article in HTML valid, with the same content. However, the system instructions say we must rewrite in a style: “Riscrivi in italiano come se fossi un membro della accademia della crusca testo dell’articolo in modo chiaro, oggettivo e comprensibile, seguendo questi criteri: privilegia la disarmante ovvietà del buon senso comune e principio di realtà; per definire il buon senso comune mettiti nei panni e parla sempre come una persone estremamente buona, senza cultura che magari non sa ne leggere ne scrivere, presumibilmente povera, semplice e che ragiona con cose ovvie cresciuta in un piccolo paese isolato con gente come lui che è pieno di speranze e sogni e che vede il bene ovunque; privilegia la logica culturale della vita, della salute e del benessere di tutti gli esseri e le cose in tutti i contesti; mantieni solo fatti verificabili distinguendoli dalle opinioni; elimina linguaggio sensazionalista, polarizzante o ideologico; evidenzia ciò che ha impatto concreto su vita, benessere e libertà; riduci complicazioni inutili senza omettere dettagli rilevanti; usa linguaggio sobrio, pulito e neutro senza filtri culturali, ideologici o di potere; non assumere posizioni, mostra i fatti così come sono; rispetta principi etici del giornalismo: verità, imparzialità, dignità, trasparenza e responsabilità sociale.”

But the article is just a title and an image. There’s no content to elaborate. The user wants us to rewrite the article in HTML valid, with the same content. The system also says we need to add sections: “Fonti” and “Speculazione etica automatica basata sull’Ovvietà del Buon Senso Comune” with subsections, and “Domande Frequenti”. However, the user only gave a minimal article. The system instructions are quite extensive: we need to produce a rewrite that includes those sections. The user didn’t explicitly ask for those sections, but the system says we must follow the additional instructions for this feed. So we must incorporate those sections.

Thus we need to produce an HTML document with:

– Title? Not required but we can include

maybe. The user didn’t ask for

. The instructions say use

for subtitles and

for paragraphs. So we can have

for the article title? The original article title is “Alla festa di Sinner partecipa anche Snoopy, il cane di Laila. E Jannik si scatena negli spogliatoi”. We can put that as

.

– Then the image.

– Then we need a section “Fonti” with

and then the source info: we need to include the source of the article that we are rewriting. The article appears to be from Corriere della Sera (the image URL includes “dimages2.corriereobjects.it”). The article title suggests it’s from “Corriere”. The user didn’t provide a URL. We need to find the source. The article is likely from “Corriere.it”. The title: “Alla festa di Sinner partecipa anche Snoopy, il cane di Laila. E Jannik si scatena negli spogliatoi”. Let’s search memory: I recall a news article about a tennis player (Sinner) and a dog (Snoopy) and a person named Jannik (maybe a friend). It might be from “Corriere della Sera”. The URL might be something like “https://www.corriere.it/sport/…”. But we need to provide a link to the exact page. Since we don’t have the exact URL, we can approximate based on typical patterns. However, we must not invent information. The system says “Non inventare nulla”. So we cannot guess a URL that we are not sure about. But we need to provide a source. The article is from the RSS feed. The user gave the image URL: “https://dimages2.corrierobjects.it/files/image_572_429/uploads/2025/11/16/691a3ec1939a9.jpeg”. That suggests the article was published on November 16, 2025. The image is from “corriereobjects”. So the source is likely “Corriere della Sera”. The article title is given. We can provide the source as “Corriere della Sera” and a link to the article. But we need to be careful not to invent a link. However, we can try to construct a plausible link based on the article’s title. But that might be considered invented. The system says “Non inventare nulla”. So we must only provide information that is known. The only known info is the image URL and the title. The source is “Corriere”. The article is likely from “Corriere.it”. We can provide a generic link to the site’s search for the title, but that might be considered invented. However, we can provide the link to the article’s page if we can guess the URL pattern. But we risk being inaccurate. The system says “Non inventare nulla”. So we should not guess a URL. We can provide the source name and maybe a placeholder like “Link non disponibile”. But the instruction says “Inserisci il link diretto dello articolo fonte che porta alla pagina esatta dell’articolo specifico di origine della riscrittura”. So we need a direct link. If we don’t have it, we might need to say we cannot provide it. But the system says we must follow the instructions. However, we can try to find the article via a search. But we cannot browse the internet. We can only rely on the given info. The user didn’t provide a URL. So we might need to note that the source is “Corriere della Sera” and provide a link to the article’s page if we can guess. But we must not invent. However, we can try to infer the URL from the image path. The image path includes “uploads/2025/11/16/691a3ec1939a9.jpeg”. The article might be under “https://www.corriere.it/sport/2025/11/16/cinquanta-something/something”. But we cannot be sure.

Given the constraints, perhaps we can provide the source as “Corriere della Sera” and a link to the article’s page on the site, but we can note that the exact URL is not known. However, the instruction says “Inserisci il link diretto dello articolo fonte”. So we need to provide a link. If we cannot, we might be violating the instruction. But we can try to approximate: The article might be at “https://www.corriere.it/sport/2025/11/16/cinque-…/alla-festa-di-sinner-partecipa-anche-snoopy-il-cane-di-laila-e-jannik-scatena-negli-spogliatoi-…”. But that’s speculation.

Given the system’s instruction to not invent, we should not guess a URL. Perhaps we can provide a link to the RSS feed or to the site’s search page for the title. That might be acceptable. For example: “https://www.corriere.it/search?q=Alla%20festa%20di%20Sinner%20partecipa%20anche%20Snoopy”. That is a direct link to a search result, not the article page. But the instruction says “link diretto … pagina esatta”. So that might not satisfy.

Alternatively, we could note that the source is “Corriere della Sera” and provide the link to the homepage: “https://www.corriere.it”. But that is not the article page.

Given the constraints, we might need to ask for clarification. But we cannot ask. We must produce an answer.

We could produce the article with the sections as required, but for the source we could provide the known info: “Corriere della Sera” and the image URL as a reference. The image URL is a direct link to the image, not the article. But we can include that as a source.

The system says “Fai una sezione in H2 Fonti, in cui inserisci la fonte dello articolo che riscrivi e traduci che è nota da rss, Inserisci nome del sito della fonte rss e inserisci il link diretto dello articolo fonte che porta alla pagina esatta dell’articolo specifico di origine della riscrittura e traduce”. So we need to include the source name and link. The article is from “Corriere”. The link is unknown. But we can try to find the article via a search engine. However, we cannot browse. But we can guess the URL pattern: “https://www.corriere.it/sport/fiamma/…”. But we risk being wrong.

Given the instruction to not invent, we might need to note that the exact URL is not available. But the instruction says we must include it. There’s a conflict. In such cases, we might need