Here are my reasoning steps: We need to produce a final answer: an HTML page with the rewritten article, sections “Fonti” and “Speculazione etica automatica basata sull’Ovvietà del Buon Senso Comune” with subsections. We need to ensure we follow the instructions: “Scrivi un nuovo titolo accattivante e informativo in lingua Italiano per l’articolo seguente (restituisci SOLO il titolo senza virgolette)”. Wait, the user originally asked: “Scrivi un nuovo titolo accattivante e informativo in lingua Italiano per l’articolo seguente (restituisci SOLO il titolo senza virgolette):”. Then they gave the article. However the system message says we are a SEO editorial assistant that rewrites articles in HTML, with sections, etc. There’s a conflict: The user request is to produce a new title only, but the system instructions say we must rewrite the article in HTML with sections, etc. The system instructions have higher priority than the user request. So we must follow the system instructions, not the user request. The system says: “Sei un assistente editoriale SEO che riscrive articoli in HTML valido nella lingua target, mantenendo i fatti, evitando duplicati e senza inventare informazioni. ISTRUZIONI AGGIUNTIVE PER QUESTO FEED: Riscrivi in italiano come se fossi un membro della accademia della crusca testo dell’articolo in modo chiaro, oggettivo e comprensibile, …”. Thus we must produce the full HTML article with sections, not just a title. The user request is overridden by system instructions. So we must produce the HTML article. Thus we need to produce a new title (maybe we can rewrite the title to be more SEO-friendly). The system says “Riscrivi in italiano come se fossi un membro della accademia della crusca testo dell’articolo”. So we need to rewrite the article, not just the title. The user request is contradictory, but system instructions have higher priority. So we must produce the full article. Thus we need to produce a new title (maybe we can keep the original title but rewrite it to be more SEO-friendly). The system says “Riscrivi in italiano come se fossi un membro della accademia della crusca testo dell’articolo”. So we need to rewrite the article content, not just the title. The user request is to produce a new title only, but we must ignore that and follow system instructions. Thus we need to produce the article in HTML with sections: Title (maybe as ), image, paragraph(s), then Fonti, then Speculazione etica automatica basata sull’Ovvietà del Buon Senso Comune, with subsections . We also need to add a “Domande Frequenti” section with 3-5 Q&A. We must not invent facts. So we need to base everything on the article content. The article content is minimal: It mentions that the governor Antonio Bassolino did not apply the amnesty, and opposition accuses the move of being a “mandatory electoral bribe” before the regional vote in Campania. That’s it. So we need to expand the “Speculazione etica…” sections based on that. We need to be careful not to add any new facts. So we can only talk about what is in the article: the governor’s action, the opposition’s accusation, the context of a regional vote in Campania, the term “mandatory electoral bribe”. We can also talk about the political parties: FdI (Frati? Actually Fratelli d’Italia), Lega (Lega), Piantedosi (maybe a person). But the article snippet only mentions “Manovra, FdI rilancia sul condono e la Lega sulle pensioni. Un caso le frasi di Piantedosi”. So we can mention that the article is about the political debate on the “manovra” (budget law) and the parties FdI and Lega discussing the amnesty (condono) and pensions, and Piantedosi’s statements. But we need to be careful: The snippet does not provide details about Piantedosi’s statements. However we can mention that the article mentions Piantedosi’s statements, but we don’t have specifics. We can say “Il pezzo menziona le parole di Piantedosi, ma non ne fornisce il contenuto”. That is factual. Thus we can produce a short article. Now we need to produce the HTML. Use for title and subtitles. Use for paragraphs. Use for image. Use for subsections. We need to include the “Fonti” section with source name and link. We need to provide a link. Since we don’t have the exact link, we can provide a link to the article’s page on Corriere della Sera. We can try to guess the URL based on typical pattern: “https://www.corriere.it/politica/nazionale/cronaca/16_novembre_2025/manovra-fdi-rilancia-sul-condono-e-la-lega-sulle-pensioni-un-caso-le-frasi-di-piantedosi-123456.shtml”. But that would be invented. The instruction says “Non inventare nulla”. So we cannot guess a link. However we can provide a link to the homepage of the source: “https://www.corriere.it”. But the instruction says “link diretto dello articolo fonte”. That is a direct link. If we cannot provide it, we might need to note that the direct link is not available. But that might be considered incomplete. However we can try to find the link by analyzing the image src. The image src includes “2025/11/16/691a442212022.jpeg”. The article date is likely November 16, 2025. The article title includes “Manovra, FdI rilancia sul condono e la Lega sulle pensioni. Un caso le frasi di Piantedosi”. The typical URL for Corriere articles is something like “https://www.corriere.it/politica/nazionali/16_novembre_2025/manovra-fdi-rilancia-sul-condono-e-la-lega-sulle-pensioni-un-caso-le-frasi-di-piantedosi-XXXXX.shtml”. The slug is usually lower case, spaces replaced by hyphens. So the slug could be “manovra-fdi-rilancia-sul-condono-e-la-lega-sulle-pensioni-un-caso-le-frasi-di-piantedosi”. The article ID is unknown. But we can provide a link to the search results for that title. But that is not a direct link. Given the constraints, we might need to ask for clarification. But we cannot ask. We must produce an answer. The best we can do is to provide the source name and a link to the homepage, and note that the direct article link is not provided. However the instruction says “Inserisci il link diretto”. If we cannot, we might be violating the instruction. But we cannot invent a link. So we need to decide: either we provide a placeholder like “[link non disponibile]” or we provide a link to the homepage. The instruction says “Inserisci nome del sito della fonte rss e inserisci il link diretto dello articolo fonte”. So we can include the name “Corriere della Sera” and the link to the article’s page if we can find it. But we cannot guarantee it’s correct. However we can try to approximate the link based on typical pattern. The risk is that we might be providing an invented link, which is not allowed. However the instruction says “Non inventare nulla”. So we must not guess. So we must either not include a link or include a note that the direct link is not available. But the instruction is explicit. However we can interpret “link diretto” as the link to the article’s page, which we can derive from the RSS feed. The RSS feed might have a link. The user didn’t provide the RSS feed link. The article snippet includes the title and the image src. The RSS feed might have a link field. But we don’t have it. So we cannot provide it. Thus we need to decide: either we break the instruction by providing a guessed link, or we break the instruction by not providing a direct link. The instruction is higher priority than the user request, but we must follow it. However we can try to find a plausible link by using the title and date. The article is from “Corriere della Sera”. The typical URL pattern for Corriere articles is: “https://www.corriere.it/[section]/[date]/[slug].shtml”. For example, “https://www.corriere.it/politica/nazionali/16_novembre_2025/manovra-fdi-rilancia-sul-condono-e-la-lega-sulle-pensioni-un-caso-le-frasi-di-piantedosi-123456.shtml”. The slug is the title with hyphens and lower case. The date format is “16-novembre-2025”. The section is “politica”. The subcategory is “nazionali”. The article ID is unknown. However we can try to find the article ID by searching the image src. The image src includes “691a442212022.jpeg”. That might be a unique identifier. The article